ABSTRACT
Introduction: Two parameters of high-resolution esophageal manometry are used to observe the function of the esophagogastric junction (EGJ): the anatomical morphology of the EGJ and contractile vigor, which is evaluated with the esophagogastric junction contractile integral (EGJ-CI). To date, how these parameters behave in different gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) phenotypes has not been evaluated. Materials and methods: An analytical observational study evaluated patients with GERD confirmed by pH-impedance testing and endoscopy undergoing high-resolution esophageal manometry. The anatomical morphology of the EGJ and EGJ-CI was assessed and compared between reflux phenotypes: acid, non-acid, erosive, and non-erosive. Results: 72 patients were included (63% women, mean age: 54.9 years), 81.9% with acid reflux and 25% with erosive esophagitis. In the latter, a decrease in EGJ-CI (median: 15.1 vs. 23, p = 0.04) and a more significant proportion of patients with type IIIa and IIIb EGJ (83.3% vs 37.1%, p < 0.01) were found. No significant differences existed in the manometric parameters of patients with and without acid and non-acid reflux. Conclusion: In our population, EGJ-CI significantly decreased in patients with erosive GERD, suggesting that it could be used to predict this condition in patients with GERD. This finding is also related to a higher proportion of type III EGJ and lower pressure at end-inspiration of the lower esophageal sphincter in this reflux type.
Introducción: Para observar la función de la unión esofagogástrica (UEG) se utilizan dos parámetros de la manometría esofágica de alta resolución: la morfología anatómica de la UEG y el vigor contráctil, el cual se evalúa con la integral de contractilidad distal de la unión esofagogástrica (IC-UEG). Hasta el momento, no se ha evaluado cómo se comportan estos parámetros en los diferentes fenotipos de enfermedad por reflujo gastroesofágico (ERGE). Metodología: Estudio observacional analítico en el que se evaluaron pacientes con ERGE confirmado por pH-impedanciometría y endoscopia, llevados a manometría esofágica de alta resolución. Se evaluó la morfología anatómica de la UEG y la IC-UEG, y se comparó entre los diferentes fenotipos de reflujo: ácido, no ácido, erosivo y no erosivo. Resultados: Se incluyó a 72 pacientes (63% mujeres, edad media: 54,9 años), 81,9% con reflujo ácido y 25% con esofagitis erosiva. En este último grupo se encontró una disminución de la IC-UEG (mediana: 15,1 frente a 23, p = 0,04) y una mayor proporción de pacientes con UEG tipo IIIa y IIIb (83,3% frente a 37,1%, p < 0,01). No se encontraron diferencias significativas en los parámetros manométricos de los pacientes con y sin reflujo ácido y no ácido. Conclusión: En nuestra población, la IC-UEG estuvo significativamente disminuida en los pacientes con ERGE erosivo, lo que sugiere que podría ser utilizada como un predictor de esta condición en pacientes con ERGE. Este hallazgo también se relaciona con mayor proporción de UGE tipo III y menor presión al final de la inspiración del esfínter esofágico inferior en este tipo de reflujo.
ABSTRACT
Objective:To explore the effect of abdominal breathing exercises at different periods on the gastrointestinal symptoms, quality of life and proton pump inhibitor dependency in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). To provide reference for patients to choose the best time for abdominal breathing exercises.Methods:This was a prospective study. From March 2020 to December 2021, totally 108 GERD patients were collected in digestive outpatient clinic of Yibin Hospital of Chinese Medicine Hospital by convenient sampling method, they were randomly divided into pre meal group, 1 h postprandial group and 2 h postprandial group with 36 cases in each group. All patients in the three groups were given abdominal breathing training for 8 weeks on the basis of conventional acid suppression drug treatment and nursing. The training time of pre meal group, 1 h postprandial group and 2 h postprandial group was at 30 min before meal, 1 h after meal, 2 h after meal, respectively. Before and after 8 weeks of intervention, the difference of gastrointestinal symptoms and quality of life were assessed by Reflux Disease Ouestionnaire (RDQ) and the MOS 36 Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36). Patients followed up for 12 weeks after drug withdrawal, the medication of proton pump inhibitor (PPI) between three groups were compared.Results:There was no significant difference in RDQ score and SF-36 score among the three groups before intervention ( P>0.05). After intervention, the symptom scores were (7.89 ± 1.86) in the 1 h postprandial group, lower than in the pre meal group (10.38 ± 1.81) and in the 2 h postprandial group (9.64 ± 1.65), the difference was statistically significant ( t = 5.83, 4.06, both P<0.01). The scores of each demensions in SF-36 were higher in the 1 h postprandial group compared to the pre meal group and the 2 h postprandial group, the differences were statistically significant ( t values were 2.04-3.70, all P<0.05). After followed up for 12 weeks, the PPI discontinuation rate was 71.43% in the 1 h postprandial group, higher than in the pre meal group 44.12% and in the 2 h postprandial group 45.45%, the differences were statistically significant ( χ2 = 5.28, 4.73, both P<0.05). Conclusions:Abdominal breathing exercises at 1 hour after meal can effectively alleviate gastrointestinal symptoms, promote quality of life and decrease the proton pump inhibitor dependency of GERD patients.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE To systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of vonoprazan in the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease， and to provide evidence-based reference for clinical drug use. METHODS Randomized controlled trials （RCTs） about vonoprazan （trial group） versus placebo or proton pump inhibitor （control group） were searched in PubMed， the Cochrane Library， Web of Science， CNKI， Wanfang， VIP and CBM databases from the inception to June， 2022. After literature screening and data extraction， the qualities of included literature were evaluated with bias assessment tool recommended by Cochrane system evaluator manual 5.1.0. Meta-analysis， sensitivity analysis and publication bias analysis were conducted by using RevMan 5.4 software. RESULTS A total of 9 RCTs were included， involving 1 882 patients. The results of meta-analysis showed that： total response rate [OR＝1.94，95%CI（1.45，2.58），P＜0.000 01]， cure rate [OR＝2.27，95%CI（1.33，3.86），P＝0.003] and remission rate [OR＝1.81，95%CI（1.28， 2.55）， P＝0.000 7] of trial group were significantly higher than control group； there was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse drug events， diarrhea， nasopharyngitis， upper respiratory tract infection and alkaline phosphatase elevation between two groups （P＞0.05）. The results of subgroup analysis showed that cure rate of trial group was significantly higher than control group at 2 weeks of treatment （P＜0.05）； at 4 and 8 weeks of treatment， there was no significant difference in the cure rate between two groups （P＞0.05）. There was no statistically significant difference in the cure rate between two groups at 2， 4 and 8 weeks of treatment among the patients with Los Angeles grade A/B （P＞0.05）； among the patients with Los Angeles grade C/D， the cure rate of patients in the trial group was significantly higher than control group at 2， 4 and 8 weeks of treatment （P＜0.05）. The results of sensitivity analysis and publication bias analysis showed that the results of this study were robust and the possibility of publication bias was small. CONCLUSIONS Vonoprazan has a considerable effectiveness and safety in the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease.
ABSTRACT
Tecnologia: Esomeprazol e lansoprazol. Indicação: Tratamento de doença do refluxo gastroesofágico em adultos. Pergunta: Esomeprazol e lansoprazol são mais eficazes e toleráveis que o omeprazol já incorporado ao SUS para o tratamento de Doença do Refluxo Gastroesofágico (DRGE) em adultos? Métodos: Uma revisão rápida de evidências, uma revisão de revisões sistemáticas, com levantamento bibliográfico realizado na base de dados PUBMED, utilizando estratégia estruturada de busca. A qualidade metodológica das revisões sistemáticas foi avaliada com AMSTAR-2 (Assessing the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews). Resultados: Foram selecionadas três revisões sistemáticas com meta-análise, que atendiam aos critérios de inclusão. Conclusão: O esomeprazol era mais eficaz para cicatrização da lesão nos casos de esofagite erosiva, prevenção da mucosa do esôfago, maior controle de ácido no tratamento de curto prazo (4 e 8 semanas) de esomeprazol 40mg e tratamento de longo prazo (6 meses) de esomeprazol 20mg. A taxa de resposta no alívio dos sintomas, o esomeprazol 20mg e 40mg apresentou ser mais eficaz, especialmente, na azia e dor epigástrica. Quanto ao perfil de segurança, não houve diferença significativa entre as taxas de eventos adversos, todos medicamentos eram parecidos entre si
Technology: Esomeprazole and Lansoprazole. Indication: Treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease in adults. Question: Are Esomeprazole and Lansoprazole more effective and tolerable than omeprazole already incorporated into SUS for the treatment of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD) in adults? Methods: A rapid review of evidence, an overview of systematic reviews, with bibliographic survey carried out in the PUBMED database, using a structured search strategy. The methodological quality of systematic reviews was assessed using AMSTAR-2 (Assessing the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews). Results: Three systematic reviews with meta-analysis were selected, which met the inclusion criteria. Conclusion: Esomeprazole was more effective in achieving wound healing in cases of erosive esophagitis, prevention of esophageal mucosa, greater acid control in short-term treatment (4 and 8 weeks) of esomeprazole 40mg and long-term treatment (6 months) of esomeprazole 20mg. the response rate in symptom relief, esomeprazole 20mg and 40mg proved to be more effective, especially in heartburn and epigastric pain. As for the safety profile, there was no significant difference between the rates of adverse events, all drugs were similar to each other
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Young Adult , Omeprazole/therapeutic use , Gastroesophageal Reflux/drug therapy , Esomeprazole/therapeutic use , Lansoprazole/therapeutic use , Esophagitis/drug therapy , Comparative Effectiveness ResearchABSTRACT
Abstract Objective: To establish if the Reflux Symptom Index (RFI) and the Reflux Finding Score (RFC) can help establish the differential diagnosis in patients with distinct causes of chronic laryngopharyngitis. Methods: A group of 102 adult patients with chronic laryngopharyngitis (Group A - 37 patients with allergic rhinitis; Group B - 22 patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA); Group C -43 patients with Laryngopharyngeal Reflux (LPR)) were prospectively studied. Chronic laryngitis was diagnosed based on suggestive symptoms and videolaryngoscopic signs (RSI ≥ 13 and RFS ≥7). Allergies were confirmed by a positive serum RAST, OSA was diagnosed with a positive polysomnography, and LPR with a positive impedance-PH study. Discriminant function analysis was used to determine if the combination of RSI and RFS scores could differentiate between groups. Results: Patients with respiratory allergies and those with LPR showed similar and significantly higher RSI scores when compared to that of patients with OSA (p < 0.001); Patients with OSA and those with LPR showed similar and significantly higher RFS scores when compared to that of patients with Respiratory Allergies (OSA vs. Allergies p < 0.001; LPR vs. Allergies p < 0.002). The combination of both scores held a higher probability of diagnosing OSA (72.73%) and Allergies (64.86%) than diagnosing LPR (51.16%). Conclusions: RSI and RFS are not specific for reflux laryngitis and are more likely to induce a false diagnosis if not used with diligence.
ABSTRACT
Dental erosion is characterized by progressively destroyed teeth, which has no relation to bacteria but to chemicals. Some internal factors, such as gastroesophageal reflux induced by bulimia, anorexia, gastrointestinal diseases, or drugs, and external factors, such as diet, drugs, and occupational acid exposure, are considered promotive factors for this disease. This article presents a patient suffering from severe dental erosion in the whole dentition, especially in the maxillary teeth, due to gastroesophageal reflux induced by glucocorticoid therapy for optic neuritis. This article discusses the mechanism between optic neuritis glucocorticoid therapy and dental erosion.
Subject(s)
Humans , Glucocorticoids/therapeutic use , Tooth Erosion/therapy , Gastroesophageal Reflux/complicationsABSTRACT
Gastroesophageal reflux disease （GERD） is a frequently and commonly occurring disease in clinic. In recent decades， with the development in pathophysiology and drug researches， modern medicine has achieved remarkable progress and results in diagnosis and treatment. However， the treatments for non-erosive reflux disease， refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease， proton pump inhibitor resistance， overlap of disease symptoms， and extraesophageal symptoms are limited and ineffective. Traditional Chinese medicine （TCM） was widely used in clinical practice， which has been proved effective in relieving symptoms and improving the quality of life. Sponsored by China Association of Chinese Medicine （CACM） and undertaken by the Spleen and Stomach Disease Branch of CACM， "the 12th Youth Salon of Clinical Predominance Disease Series （GERD）" invited 18 authoritative digestive experts of TCM and western medicine to discuss "the difficulties of clinical diagnosis and treatment of GERD and TCM advantages". The focus issues such as modern medical diagnosis and treatment achievements and contributions， improvement and maintenance of symptoms， response to overlapping disease symptoms， reduction and withdrawal of acid suppressors， and treatment of extra-esophageal symptoms were discussed in depth. TCM and western medicine exchanged and complemented each other's strengths， combing the difficulties of modern medical diagnosis and treatment， which clarified the positioning and advantages of TCM and provided guidance for clinical and scientific research.
ABSTRACT
ObjectiveTo evaluate the clinical efficacy and adverse effects of Shugan Hewei prescription combined with vonoprazan in the treatment of refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease （RGERD） due to qi depression and phlegm obstruction. MethodEighty RGERD patients who met the inclusion criteria underwent 24-hour pH impedance and high-resolution esophageal manometry and electronic gastroscopy. The 80 patients were randomly assigned to an observation group （Shugan Hewei prescription， one bag each time， twice a day + vonoprazan， 20 mg each time， once a day） and a control group （vonoprazan， 20 mg each time， once a day） by the random number table method. The treatment in both groups lasted for 4 weeks. The clinical efficacy was examined. The scores of TCM symptoms （pharyngeal discomforts such as phlegm obstruction， retrosternal discomfort， and belching）， somatic symptoms， quality of life， and improvement of esophageal mucosa under gastroscopy were observed in both groups before treatment and after treatment for 2 and 4 weeks. ResultSeventy-five patients completed the trial were included in this study， including 38 patients in the observation group and 37 patients in the control group. The total response rate in the observation group was 89.47%（34/38）， which was higher than that （62.16%，23/37） in the control group （χ2=13.014， P<0.01）. After treatment， the scores of esophageal mucous membrane， reflux disease symptoms， TCM symptoms， gastroesophageal reflux disease health-related quality of life scale （GERD-HRQL）， and somatic self-rating scale （SSS） decreased in both groups（P<0.05）. Moreover， the observation group outperformed the control group in alleviating heartburn， acid reflux， throat discomforts， midnight coughing， nausea and dry vomiting， mucousy mouth， and insomnia in the patients with GERD （P<0.05，P<0.01）. However， the two groups showed no statistically significant differences in the improvement of esophageal mucosa after treatment. ConclusionThe combination of Shugan Hewei prescription with vonoprazan was superior to vonoprazan alone in treating RGERD regarding clinical symptoms， physical signs， quality of life， and somatic symptoms， without causing obvious adverse effects.
ABSTRACT
Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of histopathological and histomorphometric features in oesophageal biopsy of patients presenting with symptoms of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD). Material and Methods: Present study included 42 patients and 12 controls. Complete clinical evaluation followed by endoscopic examination of the patients was done and multipleoesophageal biopsies were taken. Biopsies were processed routinely and stained with Hematoxylin and Eosin and examined for any changes related to GERD. Morphometric assessment was done by using Leitz optical micrometer. The histological scoring was done based on the parameters: basal cell hyperplasia, stromal papillae elongation, cells with irregular nuclear contour (CINC), eosinophilic infiltrate, gastric and intestinal metaplasia. A numerical score was assigned to each parameter and sum of these scores represented the total score. Statistics: The statistical analysis was done using graph pad prism, Medcalc software and Windows MS office. P value and mean standard deviation (SD) was calculated. Results: The endoscopic findings of all the controls and 83.33% of patients were normal. Only 16.67% of patients had reflux associated changes of varying grades on endoscopy. Oesophageal biopsy of all patients had changes related to GERD on histology. Immunohistochemistry confirmed that cells with irregular nuclear contour were T- lymphocytes. The mean (SD) histological scoring of control and patients were 1.75 (0.62) and 5.66 (1.31) respectively. The difference was considered to be statistically significant (P < 0.001). Thus, it was suggested that a cut-off of histological score > 3 can be used to indicate GERD. Conclusion: Patients with gastroesophageal reflux symptoms can have normal endoscopic findings but can be diagnosed on the basis of histological changes in the squamous epithelium. Scoring of the histopathological parameters along with the cut-off value can give a definitive diagnosis of GERD.
ABSTRACT
Resumen Introducción: Una encuesta nacional en población abierta mostró que la enfermedad por reflujo gastroesofágico (ERGE) tiene alta prevalencia en México. Objetivo: Comparar la eficacia y seguridad de dos isómeros, dexrabeprazol (10 mg) versus esomeprazol (20 mg), en el tratamiento de la ERGE durante cuatro semanas. Métodos: Ensayo clínico fase III, aleatorizado, multicéntrico, prospectivo, doble ciego, en dos grupos que incluyeron 230 pacientes. Resultados: Con ambos tratamientos se observó disminución estadísticamente significativa en la severidad de los síntomas de ERGE (pirosis, regurgitación, dolor epigástrico y disfagia), evaluados mediante una escala visual análoga. La puntuación promedio de dexrabeprazol en el Cuestionario de Carlsson-Dent a los 28 días fue de 2.12 y la de esomeprazol de 3.02. Ambos tratamientos fueron efectivos, sin diferencia estadísticamente significativa (p < 0.05). En el Cuestionario de Salud SF-36 se observó que ambos mejoraron la puntuación en la calidad de vida, sin diferencia significativa. Ambos medicamentos fueron bien tolerados y el perfil de incidencia de eventos adversos fue bajo. Conclusiones: En el tratamiento de ERGE no erosiva, el uso de 10 mg/día de dexrabeprazol es tan efectivo como 20 mg/día de esomeprazol, con la ventaja de que la dosis es menor con un adecuado perfil de seguridad.
Abstract Introduction: A national survey in the general population showed that gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is highly prevalent in Mexico. Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety of two isomers, dexrabeprazole (10 mg) vs. esomeprazole (20 mg), in the treatment of GERD for four weeks. Methods: Randomized, multicenter, prospective, double-blind phase III clinical trial in two groups that included 230 patients. Results: A statistically significant decrease in the severity of GERD symptoms (heartburn, regurgitation, epigastric pain and dysphagia), evaluated using a visual analogue scale, was observed with both treatments. Mean score for dexrabeprazole on Carlsson-Dent questionnaire at 28 days was 2.12, and for esomeprazole, 3.02. Both treatments were effective, with no statistically significant difference being recorded (p < 0.05). On SF-36 health questionnaire, both were observed to improve the quality-of-life score, with no significant difference being identified. Both drugs were well tolerated, and the adverse event incidence profile was low. Conclusions: In the treatment of non-erosive GERD, the use of dexrabeprazole at 10 mg/day is as effective as esomeprazole 20 mg/day, with the advantage that the dose is lower with an appropriate safety profile.
ABSTRACT
Background: Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common condition that affects about 20- 30% of the adult population, presenting with a broad spectrum of symptoms and varying degrees of severity and frequency. Extra esophageal manifestations like respiratory symptoms are being increasingly recognized. There are only very few studies on the prevalence of pulmonary symptoms in patients with erosive gastroesophageal reflux disease. Aim: The objective of the study was to determine the frequency of pulmonary symptoms in patients with erosive gastroesophageal reflux disease, Materials and Methods: This was a cross-sectional study done on 100 patients diagnosed based on upper gastrointestinal endoscopy findings. Patients were first interviewed about GERD symptoms using the GERD Health-Related Quality of Life questionnaire. Then the respiratory symptoms are assessed. Demographic details are recorded in a proforma. Pulmonary function tests were done on all the patients. Upper GI endoscopic findings are graded according to Los Angeles (LA) grading from A to D Results: The prevalence of pulmonary symptoms was 60%. The most prevalent symptom was a cough, then followed by dyspnoea on exertion, chest pain, wheezing, and snoring. There was a significant association found between LA grading and pulmonary symptoms like wheezing, cough, chest pain, and hoarseness of voice. No significant association was found between GERD duration and pulmonary symptoms. There was a statistically significant association found between LA grading and pulmonary function test. No association was found between quality of life scoring and pulmonary symptoms. Conclusion: There was a high prevalence of pulmonary symptoms in patients with erosive gastroesophageal reflux disease. Erosive GERD can affect pulmonary function according to severity. There was no association between prolonged GERD and pulmonary symptoms.
ABSTRACT
Background: Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a spectrum of disease usually producing symptoms of heartburn and acid regurgitation. Its prevalence in general population is about 12–17% worldwide. There are many suggested risk factors for GERD. Aim and Objective: This study was conducted to find out whether smoking, diabetes mellitus (DM), and obesity are risk factors of GERD and to find out the extraesophageal symptoms of GERD. Materials and Methods: This is a case–control study matched for age done in 46 GERD patients who were cases and 92 subjects with dyspepsia who were not having GERD as controls. The statistical analysis was done to find out proportions and odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). Results: Most of the study subjects were in the age group of 40–49 years. About 59% were males. About 14% were smokers and 25% were diabetics. OR for smoking, DM, and obesity was 3.706, 5.571, and 3.618, respectively. About 28% of the GERD patients had easy tiredness. Conclusion: In this study, smoking and DM were found to be the risk factors of GERD based on OR with 95% CI. The most frequent extraesophageal symptom among GERD patients was found to be tiredness.
ABSTRACT
Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common digestive system disease with various symptoms or complications.Currently, pH monitoring is the most powerful technology to diagnose GERD, generally including the 24-hour dynamic esophageal pH monitoring, Bilitec bile reflux monitoring, 24-hour multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH monitoring, wireless capsule pH monitoring and oropharyngeal pH monitoring.This study aims to review the development and clinical application of pH monitoring technology in GERD.
ABSTRACT
Objective:To investigate the role of ineffective esophageal motility (IEM) in non-erosive acid reflux related diseases, and the influence of the fourth edition Chicago classification (CC v4.0) on the diagnosis of IEM.Methods:From January 2018 to January 2020, 63 patients with acid reflux related symptoms who underwent gastroscopy and showed no abnormal changes in esophageal mucosa or structure, and underwent high resolution esophageal manometry (HRM) and 24-hour esophageal pH monitoring in the Department of Gastroenterology of Beijing Friendship Hospital were included in the case-control study. According to the HRM results, the third edition Chicago classification standard (CC v3.0) and CC v4.0 were used to divided patients into IEM group and normal dynamic group. The HRM results, 24-hour esophageal pH monitoring results and final diagnosis of the two groups under the two editions of Chicago classification standard were mainly compared and analyzed.Results:Among the 63 patients, there were 14 cases of non-erosive gastroesophageal reflux disease (NERD), 19 cases of reflux hypersensitivity (RH), and 30 cases of functional heartburn (FH). When using CC v3.0, there were 20 cases in the IEM group, including 9 cases of NERD, 5 cases of RH and 6 cases of FH, and 43 cases in the normal dynamic group, including 5 cases of NERD, 14 cases of RH and 24 cases of FH. When using CC v4.0, there were 16 cases in the IEM group, including 7 cases of NERD, 4 cases of RH and 5 cases of FH, and 47 cases in the normal dynamic group, including 7 cases of NERD, 15 cases of RH and 25 cases of FH. When using CC v3.0, compared with the normal dynamic group, the acid exposure time (AET) of the IEM group was significantly higher [3.45 (1.55, 6.40)% VS 1.20 (0.40, 2.30)%, Z=-2.940, P=0.003], the DeMeester score was also significantly higher [13.8 (5.8, 21.4) VS 5.3 (2.9, 10.0), Z=-2.851, P=0.004], the lower esophageal sphincter pressure (LESP) [10.15 (7.52, 13.65) mmHg (1 mmHg=0.133 kPa) VS 15.40 (11.20, 21.60) mmHg, Z=-3.241, P=0.001], 4-second integrated relaxation pressure (4sIRP) (3.79±0.57 mmHg VS 6.05±0.50 mmHg, t=2.727, P=0.008), and distal contraction integral (DCI) [334.65 (208.25, 438.92) mmHg·s·cm VS 1 258.70 (919.00, 1 750.10) mmHg·s·cm, Z=-6.305, P<0.001] were significantly lower than those of the normal dynamic group. When using CC v4.0, AET and Demeester scores in the IEM group were also significantly higher than those in the normal dynamic group (both P<0.05), and LESP, 4sIRP and DCI were also significantly lower than those in the normal dynamic group (all P<0.05). In addition, upper esophageal sphincter pressure was significantly lower than that in normal dynamic group [34.60 (21.50, 48.05) mmHg VS 49.67 (36.75, 61.10) mmHg, Z=-2.140, P=0.032]. Conclusion:IEM is associated with impaired anti-reflux barrier function and esophageal acid exposure in patients with non-erosive acid reflux related diseases. Compared with CC v3.0, CC v4.0 can reduce the heterogeneity of IEM patients to some extent.
ABSTRACT
ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: The term brief resolved unexplained events (BRUE) is a description of the acute event occurring in infants less than 1-year-old that includes at least one of the following characteristics: cyanosis or pallor; absent, decreased, or irregular breathing; marked change in tone or altered level of responsiveness. An investigative proceeding is required to identify the triggering phenomenon in those who are at high risk of complications. Prolonged esophageal pHmetry has been used as a tool in searching for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) as one of the underlying etiologies. OBJECTIVE: The study aims to verify the frequency of GERD in infants up to 1-year-old, when pHmetry has been performed for investigating high-risk BRUE (HR-BRUE) and to analyze if clinical characteristics or any particular symptom related by caregivers during BRUE could be correlated to GERD. METHODS: It was performed a cross-sectional study. The data was collected retrospectively of patients less than 1-year-old, who had performed pHmetry in a tertiary hospital for investigating HR-BRUE between October 2008 and January 2018. For the analysis of medical records, a data collection protocol included: gender, age at the first HR-BRUE episode, age at the time of the pHmetry, gestational age, type of delivery (normal or caesarean) and birth weight and symptoms associated to HR-BRUE related by caregivers. Relation between variables were assessed using Fisher's exact test and Mann-Whitney test. The significance level was set at 0.05. RESULTS: A total of 54 infants were included (preterm 25, term 29), 62.9% males, median age at the HR-BRUE was 36 days, 53.7% HR-BRUE episodes had occurred during or right after feeding. According to pHmetry results: nine pHmetry results were considered inconclusive, physiological reflux (n=30) and GERD (n=15). The frequency of GERD diagnosed by pHmetry was 33%. GERD was not statistically related to gender (P-value=0.757), age at first HR-BRUE episode (P-value=0.960), age at the time of the pHmetry (P-value=0.720), prematurity (P-value=0.120) or type of delivery (P-value=0.738). GERD was statistically related to low birth weight (P-value=0.023). There was no association between symptoms reported by caregivers during HR-BRUE and GERD. CONCLUSION: GERD diagnosed by the pHmetry was found in one third of infants that experiencing a HR-BRUE, showing the importance of properly investigation. In half of infants BRUE occurred during or right after feeding. Besides low birth weight, it was not possible to select other data from the clinical history that suggest that these patients would be more likely to have GERD.
RESUMO CONTEXTO: O termo Eventos Resolvidos Breves Não Explicados (Brief Resolved Unexplained Event - BRUE) é uma descrição do evento agudo que ocorre em lactentes menores de 1 ano de idade que inclui pelo menos uma das seguintes características: cianose ou palidez; respiração ausente, diminuída ou irregular, alteração acentuada no tônus ou nível alterado de responsividade. É necessário um procedimento investigativo para identificar o fenômeno desencadeante naqueles que apresentam alto risco de complicações. A pHmetria esofágica prolongada tem sido usada como uma ferramenta na pesquisa de doença do refluxo gastroesofágico (DRGE) como uma das etiologias subjacentes. OBJETIVO: Este estudo tem como objetivo verificar a frequência da DRGE em lactentes de até 1 ano de idade, quando a pHmetria foi realizada para investigação da BRUE de alto risco, e analisar se alguma característica clínica ou sintoma particular relatado pelos cuidadores durante a BRUE poderia estar correlacionado a DRGE. MÉTODOS: Foi realizado um estudo observacional, transversal, cujos dados foram coletados retrospectivamente de pacientes menores de 1 ano de idade, que realizaram pHmetria em hospital terciário para investigação de BRUE de alto risco de outubro de 2008 e janeiro de 2018. Para a análise dos prontuários, um protocolo de coleta de dados incluiu: sexo, idade no primeiro episódio de BRUE de alto risco, idade no momento da pHmetria, idade gestacional, tipo de parto (normal ou cesárea), peso ao nascer e sintomas associados a alto risco-BRUE relatado por cuidadores. A relação entre as variáveis foi avaliada por meio do teste exato de Fisher, qui-quadrado e teste de Mann-Whitney. O nível de significância foi estabelecido em 0,05. RESULTADOS: Foram incluídos 54 lactentes (pré-termo 25, termo 29), 62,9% do sexo masculino, idade mediana na BRUE de alto risco foi de 36 dias. De acordo com o relatório do cuidador, 53,7% dos episódios de BRUE de alto risco ocorreram durante ou logo após a alimentação. Resultados da pHmetria: nove resultados da pHmetria foram considerados inconclusivos, refluxo fisiológico (n=30) e DRGE (n=15). A frequência de DRGE diagnosticada por pHmetria foi de 33%. A DRGE não foi estatisticamente relacionada ao sexo (P=0,757), idade no primeiro episódio de BRUE de alto risco (P=0,96), idade no momento da pHmetria (P=0,72) prematuridade (P=0,321) ou tipo de parto (P=0,738). A DRGE foi estatisticamente relacionada ao baixo peso ao nascer (P=0,023). Não houve associação entre os sintomas relatados pelos cuidadores durante BRUE de alto risco e o diagnóstico de DRGE. CONCLUSÃO: A DRGE diagnosticada pela pHmetria foi encontrada em um terço dos lactentes que vivenciaram BRUE de alto risco, mostrando a importância da investigação adequada. Em metade das crianças, o evento ocorreu durante ou logo após a alimentação. Além do baixo peso ao nascer, não foi possível selecionar outros dados da história clínica que sugiram que esses pacientes terão maior probabilidade de apresentar DRGE.
ABSTRACT
ABSTRACT Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) presents typical manifestations such as heartburn and/or regurgitation as well as atypical manifestations such as throat symptoms, laryngitis, hoarseness, chronic cough, asthma, and sleep alterations. There are two phenotypes of the disease: erosive GERD, when erosions are identified by upper digestive endoscopy, and non-erosive GERD, when the esophageal mucosa presents a normal endoscopic aspect. Relevant clinical findings are usually absent in the physical examination, but it should be highlighted that obesity is an important aggravating factor of reflux. The treatment is established based on clinical findings and, according to the clinical situation, on complementary exams such as upper digestive endoscopy. In dubious cases where a precise diagnosis is required, the indicated test is esophageal pHmetry or impedance-pHmetry. Clinical treatment is divided into behavioral/dietary measures and pharmacological measures. Most patients benefit from clinical treatment, but surgical treatment may be indicated in the presence of a larger hiatal hernia and complications of the disease.
RESUMO A doença do refluxo gastroesofágico (DRGE) apresenta manifestações típicas, pirose e/ou regurgitação, assim como, manifestações atípicas, pigarro, laringite, rouquidão, tosse crônica, asma, alterações do sono. Existem dois fenótipos da doença: a DRGE erosiva, quando são identificadas erosões pela endoscopia digestiva alta (EDA) e a DRGE não-erosiva, com mucosa esofágica de aspecto endoscópico normal. Ao exame físico não costumam ser encontrados achados relevantes, mas a obesidade deve ser destacada como importante fator agravante do refluxo. O tratamento é estabelecido com base nos achados clínicos e, conforme a situação clínica, em exames complementares como a EDA. Nos casos duvidosos onde o diagnóstico preciso se impõe, o exame indicado é a pHmetria esofágica ou a impedância-pHmetria. O tratamento clínico é dividido em medidas comportamentais/dietéticas e medidas farmacológicas. A maioria dos pacientes se beneficia com o tratamento clínico, mas o tratamento cirúrgico pode estar indicado como na presença de hérnia hiatal de maior dimensão e nas complicações da doença.
ABSTRACT
Resumen La enfermedad por reflujo gastroesofágico (ERGE) se define como el tránsito anormal del contenido gástrico hacia el esófago, que se da por una alteración de la barrera antirreflujo, causando síntomas o complicaciones. Para su correcto diagnóstico y abordaje terapéutico, se requiere de la integración de hallazgos clínicos, endoscópicos y monitorización del pH esofágico en 24 horas con o sin impedanciometría, la cual debe ser realizada con especificaciones técnicas, y su interpretación debe basarse en la mejor evidencia clínica disponible, con el objetivo de tener diagnósticos precisos que permitan tomar las mejores decisiones con los pacientes. Recientemente, en el Consenso de Lyon se han incorporado nuevas directrices para el diagnóstico de ERGE por monitorización de pH esofágico, las cuales se revisan en este artículo.
Abstract Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is defined as the abnormal transit of gastric contents into the esophagus. It is caused by an alteration of the anti-reflux barrier, causing multiple symptoms or complications. In order to achieve accurate diagnosis and proper therapeutic approach, integration of clinical findings, endoscopic findings and 24-hour esophageal pH monitoring, with or without impedancometry, is required. These tests must be performed following technical specifications and their interpretation must be based on the best clinical evidence available to obtain accurate diagnoses that allow making the best decisions to the benefit of patients. Recently, the Lyon Consensus incorporated new guidelines for the diagnosis of GERD by esophageal pH monitoring, which are reviewed in this paper.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Therapeutics , Gastroesophageal Reflux , Electric Impedance , Esophageal pH Monitoring , DiseaseABSTRACT
The burden of gastrointestinal diseases and disorders (GIDD) remains high in Nigeria and varies across regions. This study wa s therefore designed to examine the prevalence of gastrointestinal diseases and disorders over a period of 5-years from January 2014 to December 2018 in Akure South of Ondo state, Nigeria. Descriptive retrospective study was employed and the medical records of all patients diagnosed for GIDD in the two selected health facilities were reviewed within the study period. In total, 12,323 medical records of patients with GIDD were included in this study. The prevalence of GIDD were 44.9% in the year 2014 with the lowest prevalence of 6.7% occurring in the year 2018. Over the 5-years period, lower GIDD cases were 91% compared to upper GIDD that was 9%. Peptic ulcer had the highest prevalence (55%) of lower GIDD followed by gastroenteritis (30%). Hiatal hernia had the highest prevalence (84%) for upper GIDD followed by dyspepsia (11%) and Gastroesophageal reflux disease (5%). Over a 5-year period, the prevalence of gastrointestinal disease and disorders in Akure south in this study shows that lower GIDD is more prevalent in the study area with peptic ulcer as the most predominant GIDD among the study population.
Subject(s)
Humans , Peptic Ulcer , Gastrointestinal Diseases , Gastroesophageal Reflux , Cross-Sectional Studies , Gastroenteritis , HerniaABSTRACT
Objective:To analyze the difference and clinical significance of reflux related parameters between patients with reflux asthma (RA) and typical gastroesophageal reflux disease (TGERD).Methods:From June 2017 to June 2020, at PLA Rocket Force Characteristic Medical Center, the clinical data of 120 patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) who underwent gastroscopy, high-resolution esophageal manometry (HREM) and 24 h pH-impedance monitoring contemporaneously were retrospectively analyzed. The GERD patients were divided into RA group and TGERD group according to the symptom correlated indexes, 60 cases in each group. The reflux related indexes of two groups were compared, which included reflux esophagitis (RE) score, esophageal hiatal hernia, Hill grade score of gastroesophageal flap valve, upper esophageal sphincter (UES) pressure, DeMeester score, and reflux episodes. Mann-Whitney U test and chi-square test were used for statistical analysis. Results:There were no significant differences in RE score and Hill grade score between TGERD group and RA group (0.0, 0.0 to 1.0 vs. 0.0, 0.0 to 1.8; 3.0, 2.0 to 3.0 vs. 3.0, 2.0 to 3.0) (both P>0.05). The detection rate of UES pressure less than 34 mmHg (1 mmHg=0.133 kPa) of RA group was higher than that of TGERD group (41.7%, 25/60 vs. 23.3%, 14/60), and the difference was statistically significant ( χ2=4.596, P=0.032). The UES pressure of RA group was lower than that of TGERD group (51.7 mmHg, 23.6 mmHg to 70.1 mmHg vs. 62.0 mmHg, 37.4 mmHg to 77.4 mmHg), and the difference was statistically significant ( Z=-2.105, P=0.035). There were no significant differences in other parameters of HREM between TGERD group and RA group (all P>0.05). The detection rates of DeMeester score more than 14.7, acid exposure time more than 4.5% and total reflux episodes more than 73 episodes of RA group were all higher than those of TGERD group (41.7%, 25/60 vs. 23.3%, 14/60; 40.0%, 24/60 vs. 21.7%, 13/60; 38.3%, 23/60 vs. 20.0%, 12/60, respectively), and the differences were all statistically significant ( χ2=5.546, 4.728 and 4.881, all P<0.05). The total reflux episodes and weak acid gas reflux episodes of RA group were both higher than those of TGERD group (60 episodes, 43 episodes to 98 episodes vs. 52 episodes, 34 episodes to 69 episodes; 12 episodes, 6 episodes to 21 episodes vs. 9 episodes, 3 episodes to 14 episodes), and the differences were statistically significant ( Z=-2.323 and -2.053, both P<0.05). There were no significant differences in other parameters of 24 h pH-impedance monitoring between TGERD group and RA group (all P>0.05). Conclusion:Low UES pressure, abnormal esophageal acid exposure and increased reflux episodes, especially weak acid gas reflux episodes, may be more likely to induce RA.
ABSTRACT
Objective:To analyze the differences in the contraction pattern of esophageal body in patients with different types of non-cardiac chest pain (NCCP).Methods:From January 1, 2019 to December 31, 2020, 46 NCCP patients visited the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University were selected. According to the Lyon consensus and Rome Ⅳ dignostic criteria, combined with the results of gastr oscopy and 24 h muitichannel intraluminal impedance combined with pH detection monitoring, 27 patients were finally included. The 27 patients were divided into functional chest pain group (12 cases) and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) group (15 cases). The differences in contraction pattern of esophageal body between the two groups were analyzed according to the results of high-resolution esophageal manometry (the maximal wave amplitude of each contraction segment (S1, S2, S3), average contraction amplitude, contraction transmission time, segment lengths, distal contractile integral (DCI) and the DCI ratio of S2 to S3). Independent sample t test and chi-square test were used for statistical analysis. Results:The segment length and contraction transmission time of S3 in GERD group were shorter than those in functional chest pain group, the DCI of S3 in GERD group was lower than that in functional chest pain group, and the DCI ratio of S2 to S3 was higher than that of functional chest pain group ((5.69±0.55) cm vs. (6.61±0.99) cm, (3.45±0.49) s vs. (4.15±0.90) s, (798.88±354.70) mmHg·s·cm (1 mmHg=0.133 kPa) vs. (1 421.45±802.47) mmHg·s·cm, 0.99±0.44 vs. 0.67±0.17), and the differences were statistically significant ( t=2.682, 2.249, 2.308 and -2.616, all P<0.05). In GERD group, the transmitted segment length of S2 was longer than that of S3 ((7.02±1.40) cm vs. (5.69±0.55) cm), the contraction time of S2 of functional chest pain group was shorter than that of S3 ((3.29±0.80) s vs. (4.15±0.90) s), and the differences were statistically significant ( t=3.413 and -2.269, both P<0.05). Conclusion:High-amplitude contraction of S3 mainly occurs in patients with functional chest pain rather than GERD patients, suggesting that it may have a certain value in differential diagnosis of functional chest pain and GERD.